(un)titled
24 Comments so far
Leave a comment
does this count as a post?
24 Comments so far
Leave a comment
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
aporia pidgeon 
no
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:12 pmyes, if it has attracted any comment
Comment by anon September 14, 2007 @ 5:14 pmoh shoot !
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:19 pmwell, we could call it a pillar
Comment by anon September 14, 2007 @ 5:20 pma blog pillar?
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:21 pmMore like a Totem Pole if you ask me
Comment by GoodChap September 14, 2007 @ 5:25 pmtotelm of what?
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:26 pmpidgeon droppings?
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:29 pmin fairness, panda poo seems to be doing alright
Comment by p batt September 14, 2007 @ 5:33 pmpoint taken, thanks you lot
Comment by aporia pidgeon September 14, 2007 @ 5:39 pmahh – but is point counted?
Comment by p wittgenstein September 14, 2007 @ 5:40 pmAs what exactly?
Comment by GoodChap September 14, 2007 @ 5:40 pmas … nah, nothing
Comment by p wittgenstein September 14, 2007 @ 5:41 pmNo, go on – just say it!
Comment by GoodChap September 14, 2007 @ 5:42 pmno, really: nothing
Comment by p wittgenstein September 14, 2007 @ 5:44 pmYou must have been about to say *something*
Comment by GoodChap September 14, 2007 @ 5:46 pmyes! nothing!
Comment by p wittgenstein September 14, 2007 @ 5:46 pmdo nothings count?
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:47 pmonly if they’re sweet
Comment by aporia pidgeon September 14, 2007 @ 5:49 pm“mm”
Comment by panda September 14, 2007 @ 5:50 pmc’est la differance entre “iterability” et “irritability”
Comment by p derrida September 14, 2007 @ 5:52 pmif you’ll excuse his freNch
Comment by aporia pidgeon September 14, 2007 @ 5:55 pmeNough said
Comment by p wittgenstein September 14, 2007 @ 5:59 pmQuite agree.
Comment by GoodChap September 14, 2007 @ 6:00 pm